![]() ![]() consistently letting NASA “pass with flying colors” would raise great suspicion. Not to mention the bribed auditors, investigators, etc. Additionally, the more people added to the bribing payroll, the more suspicious things become as more and more money must be dished out. ![]() And as more and more people are let into the secret, the more the possibilities increase of some sort of leak. It would require the bribing of many hundreds more people, spanning generations of workers. But sustained, consistent embezzling/fraud/secrecy would not hold up for the decades that NASA has existed. Granted, it could happen over short periods of time or in short, irregular intervals. ![]() If money were to mysteriously go missing, someone would notice. It is a fact that every government entity is audited fraud, waste and abuse included). It is out there and often they even publish auditing reports. I can only imagine how much the government and its programs (notably NASA) are strictly audited (if you don’t believe that they are audited, Google it: for example. We have not only internal auditing but government auditing as well. I have some conception of what it means to be audited working in the back offices of a bank. I say these motives are flimsy at best.įirst point: government auditing. You also say that power or control may play a part. You are accusing (from what I gather) NASA heads and various others of “avarice”, in other words, going after money. It is based on motive and intent, these being two basic parts of any case brought forth attempting to indict someone. I respect you (I respect anyone that stands up for their cause), so please do me the same honor. From what I’ve seen the FE’s will probably come up with something to refute it, but please consider with an open mind. After reading through the FAQ and many threads, I have what I think to be a valid point. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |